Sunday Labs – App Development, Fintech Development, Banking, Insurance, Blockhain and web3, Game Development, Poker, Rummy, Fantasy games, LMS

Microservices architecture — is it worth the hoopla?

Picture of Aditya Vandhye

Aditya Vandhye

3 min read

In the ever-evolving world of software architecture, one term has generated a significant amount of “hoopla” in recent years — microservices.

Every time I talk to a budding developer and entrepreneur — there is one thing in common. Everyone wants their software to be written using a microservices architecture. A slight deep-dive on why they want so reveals that it helps in building a distributed system and scaling to millions of users.

Seriously? Man, you haven’t yet figured out the PMF and you are talking about a million-user scale. Even if so, is it the solution? You might kill me for this but I don’t think so!

In this blog, we’ll explore the origins of microservices, delve into code snippets, look at companies successfully leveraging this architecture, discuss cases where it may not be the best fit, weigh the pros and cons, and ultimately help you decide if microservices are the right choice for your product and team.

The Origins of Microservices

Microservices are an evolution of the service-oriented architecture (SOA) principles, and they’ve gained prominence in the era of cloud computing and DevOps. The concept of microservices is rooted in breaking down complex applications into smaller, independent services that can be developed, deployed, and scaled separately. This approach allows for better flexibility, scalability, and maintenance of software systems.

Code Snippets: A Glimpse into Microservices

# Order Service
@app.route(“/create_order”, methods=[“POST”])
def create_order():
# Business logic to create an order
return “Order created successfully”

# Inventory Service
@app.route(“/update_inventory”, methods=[“POST”])
def update_inventory():
# Business logic to update inventory
return “Inventory updated”

# Payment Service
@app.route(“/process_payment”, methods=[“POST”])
def process_payment():
# Business logic to process payment
return “Payment processed successfully”

In this example, we have three microservices (Order, Inventory, and Payment) that communicate via HTTP requests. Each service focuses on a specific business capability, and they can be developed and deployed independently.

Companies Embracing Microservices — Netflix, Uber, Amazon

Companies Using Monolith — Microsoft, Oracle, Salesforce

When to Go for Microservices

The decision to embrace microservices should be driven by your project’s requirements. Consider microservices when:

  • You anticipate rapid growth and need scalable solutions.
  • Your team is experienced in managing distributed systems.
  • You require independent development, testing, and deployment of components.
  • Your application has clearly defined, isolated functionalities.

Time to Build for Microservices

  1. Initial Development: Building a software system using a microservices architecture often requires more time upfront compared to a monolithic approach. This is because you’re essentially developing multiple small, independent services, each with its own codebase, APIs, and infrastructure. This initial overhead can extend the time it takes to deliver a minimum viable product (MVP).
  2. Team Coordination: Microservices often involve multiple development teams, each responsible for a specific service. Coordinating the work of these teams, especially in larger projects, can be time-consuming. Effective communication and collaboration are crucial to ensure that each service aligns with the overall project goals.
  3. Deployment and Orchestration: Microservices demand more sophisticated deployment and orchestration mechanisms. Containerization technologies like Docker and container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes are often used, which can require additional setup and configuration. However, once set up, they facilitate easier and more frequent deployments.
  4. Testing and Integration: Testing in a microservices architecture is inherently more complex due to the distributed nature of the system. Ensuring that all services work together seamlessly may take more time, and a robust testing strategy is essential to catch issues early.
  5. Iterative Development: Over time, as the project evolves, microservices can offer faster development cycles. Individual services can be updated or extended independently, which can lead to quicker feature development and release.
  6. Scaling: Microservices allow for fine-grained scalability, meaning you can scale specific services as needed. This can lead to faster response times and better performance when compared to a monolithic system that scales as a whole.

Time to Build for Monolith

  1. Initial Development: Building a monolithic application typically requires less upfront effort because everything is contained within a single codebase. You can quickly create a functional prototype and get started with development.
  2. Simplicity: Monoliths are simpler to develop, test, and deploy initially. There’s no need for the complex setup of microservices infrastructure, which can speed up development time.
  3. Single Development Team: Monolithic applications can be developed by a single team, which simplifies coordination and communication. Team members can have a shared understanding of the entire codebase.
  4. Deployment: Deploying a monolithic application is straightforward as there’s only one unit to deploy. This simplicity can lead to faster release cycles in the early stages.
  5. Testing: Testing a monolithic application is more straightforward, as all components are tightly integrated. This can result in quicker identification and resolution of issues during development.
  6. Scaling: While monolithic applications can be scaled horizontally by replicating the entire application, the process may not be as fine-grained or efficient as microservices.

Choosing Between Microservices and Monolith

The decision on whether to opt for microservices or a monolithic architecture should be influenced by your project’s specific needs and constraints. If rapid development and time-to-market are your primary goals, a monolithic architecture might be more suitable initially. On the other hand, if you anticipate long-term scalability and agility, and are willing to invest time in setup and coordination, microservices could be the way to go.

It’s important to note that some organizations choose a hybrid approach, starting with a monolithic architecture for simplicity and transitioning to microservices as the project evolves and the need for scalability and flexibility becomes more pressing. This allows them to balance the advantages of both approaches while managing the associated time and complexity.

Let’s talk more on this? Here is the link to my calendly —



Don't forget to share this post!

Related Articles

Wake up to the realities of starting up!

A seasoned entrepreneur’s insight prompts reflection on startups straying from market realities. In this blog, we explore the practical aspects of addressing demand-supply gaps, the imperative of engaging with the real world, and a nuanced understanding of funding for scaling innovations.

Building with Purpose

One can easily get swayed by the delusion in the fancies of funding, raising capital, and focusing solely on valuation rather than value creation. In general, businesses tend to fail with that approach.

Successful entrepreneurship hinges on purposeful solutions that fill genuine demand-supply gaps. Thriving startups authentically respond to real-world problems, ensuring their offerings align with market needs.

Engaging with Reality

“Stepping into the real world” is our immediate call to action, urging entrepreneurs to immerse themselves in tangible audience needs. Comprehensive market research and direct user engagement foster solutions that organically resonate.

Survival vs. Scaling

Funding should ideally be a strategic resource for growth, not a survival prerequisite. A robust business model, independent of constant funding, reflects a startup’s resilience and genuine demand.

The Exception

We do understand that while most businesses can shift focus on value creation and thrive, some exceptional technologies may require resources to kick-start.

Groundbreaking technologies, like ChatGPT, may require substantial resources. While not universal, this exception highlights the importance of discerning the startup’s nature and funding needs.


In the dynamic startup landscape, relevance and impact demand a pragmatic approach. By addressing real demand-supply gaps, engaging with the real world, and nuanced funding, entrepreneurs can navigate with purpose. Building businesses that matter is about leaving a meaningful imprint by providing solutions deeply rooted in authentic needs.

Featured Post

Why Hiring an Extended Team Can Catapult Your Growth?

In the fast-paced world of tech, the revolving door of developer talent has become a prevalent challenge for companies aiming to build robust in-house teams. With the median time developers spend at a company just over one year, it’s time to rethink traditional hiring strategies. In this blog, we explore the drawbacks of sticking to the status quo and advocate for a game-changing approach: hiring an extended team to leapfrog competition, accelerate product development, and minimize opportunity costs.

Embracing Change:

The traditional model of investing time and resources in building an in-house tech team, only to witness high turnover rates, is a costly affair. Instead of running marathons while still figuring out how to walk, businesses should consider a more agile and strategic approach. By embracing change and hiring an extended team, companies can navigate the challenges of talent retention and maximize their potential for success.

Opportunity Costs Unveiled:

Building an in-house team demands time, effort, and significant financial investment. However, the risk of losing millions in opportunity costs becomes apparent when developers, on average, switch jobs every year. Waiting for the perfect cultural fit can further delay progress and hinder growth. It’s time to prioritize results over cultural nuances and opt for a more pragmatic hiring approach.

The Extended Team Advantage:

Hiring an extended team offers a solution to the pitfalls of the one-year turnover trend. This model allows companies to tap into a global pool of skilled professionals without the need for a lengthy recruitment process. By collaborating with seasoned experts who have already demonstrated their commitment and expertise, businesses can fast-track product development, scale efficiently, and, most importantly, reduce the risk of losing valuable time and resources.

Leapfrogging the Competition:

In a landscape where speed is often the key to success, the extended team approach becomes a game-changer. Rather than investing months in assembling an in-house team, companies can leapfrog the competition by swiftly onboarding an extended team. This agile approach enables businesses to focus on what matters most — building and scaling their product — without succumbing to the pitfalls of prolonged hiring processes.


In a world where change is the only constant, businesses must adapt their strategies to stay ahead. The one-year turnover trend among developers is a clear signal that the traditional in-house hiring model is no longer the most effective option. By embracing the extended team approach, companies can minimize opportunity costs, accelerate growth, and leapfrog the competition. It’s time to shift the paradigm and build a tech team that propels your business forward. Don’t run marathons when you can leapfrog to success!

PS. We can help. Let’s talk. Link to my calendar —

Featured Post

What is the right time to raise funds?

The startup ecosystem is abuzz with innovation, energy, and a constant quest for funding. While passion and dedication are essential ingredients for success, financial resources play a crucial role in propelling a startup from its nascent stages to exponential growth. However, timing your fundraising efforts is critical to maximizing your chances of securing the right investment and achieving your entrepreneurial dreams.

The Counterintuitive Art of Raising Funds from a Position of Strength

The conventional wisdom surrounding fundraising often suggests that seeking capital is urgent, especially when the startup is in its initial phases. However, this approach may not always yield the best results. Raising funds when your startup is demonstrating traction and displaying a proven business model can be far more advantageous.

This counterintuitive strategy stems from the simple fact that investors are more likely to be attracted to a startup that has already established its viability and potential for growth. When your startup has a clear runway, a solid track record of generating revenue, and a unique value proposition, you are in a better position to negotiate favourable terms with potential investors.

Traction: The Investor’s Magnet

Traction, a measure of a startup’s growth and momentum, is a key factor investors consider when evaluating funding opportunities. They seek evidence that your startup is gaining traction in its target market, demonstrating user engagement, and making strides towards achieving its business objectives.

While the exact level of traction required to attract investors varies depending on the industry and stage of the startup, consistently demonstrating month-over-month growth is a strong indicator of success. This upward trajectory signals to investors that your startup has the potential to scale and generate significant returns.

Relationships: The Cornerstone of Fundraising Success

Building relationships with potential investors is an ongoing process that should not be relegated to the fundraising stage alone. Networking with industry experts, attending investor conferences, and actively engaging with the startup community can open doors to valuable connections.

Establishing a rapport with investors early on provides an opportunity to showcase your startup’s vision, team, and potential. It also allows investors to get a firsthand understanding of your leadership, expertise, and ability to execute your business plan. These connections can prove invaluable when the time comes to seek funding formally.

The Right Time is Now: Seizing the Moment

The ideal time to raise funds for your startup is when you have a combination of factors working in your favour:

  • Adequate Runway: A healthy runway, the amount of time a startup can operate without additional funding, provides stability and allows for strategic decision-making.
  • Demonstrated Traction: Consistent growth and user engagement validate your startup’s potential and attract investor interest.
  • Strong Relationships: Cultivated connections with potential investors foster trust and understanding, increasing the likelihood of favourable terms.

When these elements converge, your startup is well-positioned to secure the right funding at the right time. Remember, raising funds is not just about securing financial resources; it’s about partnering with investors who believe in your vision and can provide valuable guidance and support as your startup embarks on its journey to success.

But, end of the day you should never prioritise fundraising more than building your product and business. Build a business that becomes a magnet for investors. Then you can raise money on your terms!

Are you raising money or looking at how can you leverage tech to do so?

Let’s talk? —

Featured Post
Load More