Security Assessment & Penetration Testing

Find the weaknesses an attacker would use, before they do.

We test your web and mobile apps, APIs, cloud accounts and internal networks the way a real attacker would, with manual testing on top of automated scans. Every finding comes with its business impact, clear fix guidance and a retest once you have fixed it.

The problem

Why penetration tests so often disappoint.

01

Scanner output passed off as a test

An automated scan finds known issues. It misses broken access control, business logic flaws and chained attacks, which are what real breaches use.

02

Hundreds of findings, no priorities

A report lists every low-risk header next to a critical flaw, and the team cannot tell where to start.

03

Tests that ignore how you work

Testing runs at the wrong time, breaks a production job or misses the systems that changed since the last review.

04

Nobody checks the fixes

Issues are marked closed in a tracker, but nobody confirms the fix works until the next annual test finds them again.

What we test

Testing that leads to fixes.

Each test is scoped to what you run and what you need to prove, whether that is to your board, a customer or an auditor.

01

Web application testing

Manual and automated testing of your web apps for access control, authentication, injection, business logic and session flaws.

  • OWASP Top 10
  • Business logic
  • Auth
02

API security testing

REST and GraphQL APIs tested for broken object level authorisation, excessive data exposure, rate limits and weak tokens.

  • REST
  • GraphQL
  • OWASP API Top 10
03

Mobile application testing

Android and iOS apps tested on device and in code: local storage, certificate pinning, backend calls and reverse engineering.

  • Android
  • iOS
  • OWASP MASVS
04

Cloud and network testing

External and internal network tests plus configuration reviews of AWS, Azure and GCP accounts against CIS Benchmarks.

  • Internal network
  • Cloud config
  • CIS
05

Threat modelling

A structured look at a system's design before or during build, so the riskiest paths are tested and designed out first.

  • STRIDE
  • Data flows
  • Design review
06

Red team style exercises

Goal-based exercises that combine phishing simulation, external access and lateral movement to test your detection and response.

  • Adversary simulation
  • Detection
  • MITRE ATT&CK

How we deliver

From scope to confirmed fixes.

Clear rules of engagement up front, critical findings shared straight away and a retest at the end.

Always included

  • A named senior lead who stays with you from scoping to retest
  • Every finding ranked by risk, with clear fix guidance and a retest once you have fixed it
  • Reports, configurations and runbooks documented and owned by you
  • A founder reviewing the work every week, and an NDA signed before we touch anything

Typical tools

  • Burp Suite
  • OWASP ZAP
  • Nmap
  • Metasploit
  • Nuclei
  • MobSF
  • Prowler
  • BloodHound
01
Week 1

Scope and rules of engagement

We agree what is in scope, how and when we test and who to call if something looks wrong.

  • Systems, environments and test accounts agreed
  • Testing windows and emergency contacts in writing
  • Threat model for the most critical systems
02
Weeks 1 to 3

Testing

Manual testing by senior testers, supported by automated tools.

  • Reconnaissance, scanning and manual exploitation
  • Critical findings reported the same day
  • Evidence captured for every finding
03
Weeks 3 to 4

Report and walkthrough

A report your engineers can act on and your leadership can read.

  • Executive summary in plain language
  • Findings ranked by risk with reproduction steps
  • Walkthrough session with your engineering team
04
When you are ready

Retest and close

We confirm your fixes work and update the report.

  • Retest of every fixed finding
  • Updated report showing what is closed
  • Recommendations for the next test cycle

FAQ

Questions we hear a lot.

What is the difference between a vulnerability assessment and a penetration test?
A vulnerability assessment finds and lists known weaknesses, mostly with automated tools. A penetration test goes further: a tester tries to exploit those weaknesses, chain them together and reach real data or systems, which shows what an attacker could actually do. Most clients need both, and VAPT is the common name for doing them together.
Will testing disrupt our production systems?
We plan to avoid it. We agree testing windows, rate limits and any systems that must not be touched, test in staging where it mirrors production and keep an emergency contact on both sides. Destructive tests only happen with your written approval.
Black box, grey box or white box testing: which do we need?
Black box testing, with no inside knowledge, shows what an outsider sees. Grey box, with test accounts and some documentation, finds more in the same time and is what we recommend for most applications. White box, with source code access, suits critical systems where you want the deepest assurance.
Is retesting included?
Yes. Once you have fixed the findings, we retest them and update the report to show what is closed. A test is only useful if the fixes are confirmed.
Will the report satisfy our customers and auditors?
Our reports include scope, method, dates, findings with evidence and retest status, which is what customers, ISO 27001 and SOC 2 auditors and most regulators ask for. If a regulator or customer requires testing by a specifically empanelled or accredited firm, tell us early and we will say honestly whether that applies.
How often should we test?
At least once a year, and after any major change: a new application, a large release, a cloud migration or a new integration with sensitive data. Many teams also test critical applications before each major release.

Talk to a founder about Security Assessment.

Tell us where you are. We will come back within one business day with a point of view, not a sales deck.